The Effect of Prolonged Face Mask Ventilation on Gastric Insufflation: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary aspiration is a potentially lethal perioperative complication that can be precipitated by gastric insufflation. Face mask ventilation (FMV), a ubiquitous anesthetic procedure, can cause gastric insufflation. FMV with an inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O provides the best balance between adequate pulmonary ventilation and a low probability of gastric insufflation. There is no data about the effects of FMV > 120 seconds. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of prolonged FMV on gastric insufflation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study at a tertiary medical center with female patients who underwent oocyte retrieval surgery under general anesthesia FMV. Pre- and postoperative gastric ultrasound examinations measured the gastric antral cross-sectional area to detect gastric insufflation. Pressure-controlled FMV with an inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O was continued from the anesthesia induction until the end of the surgery. RESULTS: The study comprised 49 patients. Baseline preoperative gastric ultrasound demonstrated optimal and good image quality. All supine measurements were feasible. The median duration of FMV was 13 minutes (interquartile range 9-18). In the postoperative period, gastric insufflation was detected in only 2 of 49 patients (4.1%). There was no association between the duration of FMV and delta gastric antral cross-sectional area (ß -0.01; 95% confidence interval -0.04 to 0.01, P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled FMV with an inspiratory pressure of 15 cm H2O carries a low incidence of gastric insufflations, not only as a bridge to a definitive airway but as an alternative ventilation method for relatively short procedures in selective populations.

Additive value of superficial parasternal intercostal plane block and serratus anterior plane block in lung transplantation surgery: a retrospective exploratory study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control following lung transplantation (LTx) surgery is paramount. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is the gold standard; however, the potential use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and consequent anticoagulation therapy raises safety concerns, prompting clinicians to seek safer alternatives. The utility of thoracic wall blocks in general thoracic surgery is well established; however, their role in the context of LTx has been poorly investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective exploratory study, we assessed the effect of adding a superficial parasternal intercostal plane (sPIP) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block to standard anesthetic and analgesic care on tracheal extubation rates, pain scores and opioid consumption until 72 hours postoperatively in LTx. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the analysis; 35 received the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (control group), and 25 received sPIP and SAP blocks in addition to the standard anesthetic and analgesic care (intervention group). We observed higher tracheal extubation rates in the intervention group at 8 hours postoperatively (16.0% vs 0.0%, p=0.03). This was also shown after adjusting for known prognostic factors (OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33, p=0.02). Furthermore, we noted a lower opioid consumption measured by morphine milligram equivalents at 24 hours in the intervention group (median 405 (IQR 300-490) vs 266 (IQR 168-366), p=0.02). This was also found after adjusting for known prognostic factors (ß -118; 95% CI -221 to 14, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: sPIP and SAP blocks are safe regional analgesic techniques in LTx involving ECMO and clamshell incision. They are associated with faster tracheal extubation and lower opioid consumption. These techniques should be considered when TEA is not appropriate. Further high-quality studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

The relationship between postpartum pain and mother-infant bonding: A prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Postpartum pain is associated with impaired maternal recovery and may influence mother-infant bonding. METHODS: Participants who underwent a vaginal or cesarean delivery were assessed 24 h postpartum. Postpartum pain intensity was measured using the Verbal Numeric Score (VNS) (0-10) and classified as non-severe (<8) or severe pain (≥8). Maternal-infant bonding was evaluated using the Post-Partum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ; 0-125), with a score > 5 defining impaired bonding. Demographic data included age, BMI, parity, education level, economic status, partnership, prior history of depression, familial history of depression, desire to breastfeed, epidural analgesia during labor, rooming in, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Data were analyzed using 2 separate multivariable logistic regression models for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, where maximum postpartum pain was the independent variable and impaired postpartum bonding was the dependent variable and controlled for the other factors collected. RESULTS: Severe postpartum pain (VNS ≥ 8) showed no significant relationship with impaired bonding when controlling for confounding variables. In vaginal deliveries, there was an association between a history of depression and impaired bonding (Odds Ratio 2.2 [1.07-4.65], p = 0.04) and EPDS > 10 and impaired bonding (OR 11.5 [3.2-73.6], p < 0.001). For cesarean deliveries, rooming in with the baby had a protective effect (OR 11.5 [3.2-73.6], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to expectations, severe postpartum pain did not influence maternal-infant binding in the cohort of patients with vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Instead, factors such as maternal mental health and rooming-in practices appeared to exert more significant influence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05206552.

Endobronchial closure of broncho-biliary fistula using Amplatzer device: Case report.

Broncho-biliary fistula (BBF) is an extremely rare but serious medical condition resulting from pathological communication between the biliary system and the bronchial tree. Treatment options include both surgical and non-surgical approaches. Several endobronchial techniques, such as the spigot and glue, can be used for this purpose. This report discusses a patient who developed a broncho-biliary fistula following a liver biopsy. The BBF was diagnosed during bronchoscopy and successfully treated with an endobronchial Amplatzer device. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of the Amplatzer device to manage BBF.

Amplatzer Occluders for Effective Nonsurgical Management of Bronchopleural Fistulae.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and efficacy of bronchopleural fistulae closure with Amplatzer occluder devices (AGA Medical, Golden Valley, MN) through our experience of over 14 years. METHODS: Retrospective data review of patients from Rabin Medical Center who underwent Amplatzer occluder device placement between March 2007 and September 2021 for bronchopleural fistulae closure. RESULTS: In total, 72 patients had 83 Amplatzer occluder devices implanted for bronchopleural fistulae closure. The median age was 65.5 (interquartile range 56.0-72.3) years. The primary diseases were lung malignancy (48 [66.7%]) and thoracic infection (9 [12.5%]). Bronchopleural fistulae developed mainly following pneumonectomy (40.3%) and lobectomy (33.3%), with a median time from surgery to Amplatzer placement of 3.9 (interquartile range 1.4-16.4) months. We encountered no procedural or immediate postprocedural complications or deaths. Six months after Amplatzer insertion, there were 7 (8.4%) Amplatzer removals and 11 (15.3%) fistula-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Amplatzer occluders are a safe modality for nonsurgical bronchopleural fistulae management with ease of placement under moderate sedation and flexible bronchoscopy with good short- and long-term effectivity.

The effect of placement and management of intrathecal catheters following accidental dural puncture on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and severity: a retrospective real-world study.

Accidental dural puncture during an attempt to establish labour epidural analgesia can result in postdural puncture headache and long-term debilitating conditions. Epidural blood patch, the gold standard treatment for this headache, is invasive and not always successful. Inserting an intrathecal catheter after accidental dural puncture may prevent postdural puncture headache. We evaluated the effect of intrathecal catheter insertion on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and the need for epidural blood patch and whether duration of intrathecal catheterisation or injection of intrathecal saline affected outcome. Our retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary, university-affiliated medical centres between 2017 and 2022 and included 92,651 epidurals and 550 cases of accidental dural puncture (0.59%); 219 parturients (39.8%) received an intrathecal catheter and 331 (60.2%) a resited epidural. Use of an intrathecal catheter versus resiting the epidural did not decrease the odds of postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 0.91 (0.81-1.01), but was associated with a lower need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.82 (0.73-0.91), p < 0.001). We found no benefit in leaving in the intrathecal catheter for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, aOR (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00-1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99-1.01), p = 0.40). We found an added benefit of injecting intrathecal saline as it decreased the incidence of postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99), p = 0.04) and the need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64-0.87), p < 0.001). Our study confirms the benefits of intrathecal catheterisation and provides guidance on how to best manage an intrathecal catheter.

Regional analgesia for lung transplantation: A narrative review.

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment for end-stage pulmonary disease. About 4500 LTxs are performed annually worldwide. It is considered challenging and complex surgery regarding anaesthesia and pain management. While providing adequate analgesia is crucial for patient comfort, early mobilisation and prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications, standardising an analgesic protocol is challenging due to the diversity of aetiologies, surgical approaches and the potential use of extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Although thoracic epidural analgesia is commonly considered the gold standard, concerns regarding procedural safety and its potential for devastating consequences have led physicians to seek safer analgesic modalities such as thoracic nerve blocks. The advantages of thoracic nerve blocks for general thoracic surgery are well established. However, their utility in LTx remains unclear. Considering paucity of relevant literature, this review aims to raise awareness about the literature gap in the field and highlight the need for further high-quality studies determining the effectiveness of available techniques.

The effect of preoperative anxiety and ovarian stimulation on gastric antrum size: a prospective observational study.

Pulmonary aspiration is a potentially lethal perioperative complication related to gastric size and contents. Several perioperative factors are believed to increase gastric size, while others are less studied. This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative anxiety and hormone-induced ovarian stimulation on gastric size examined by gastric ultrasound. We recruited 49 female patients undergoing hormone-induced ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization at Rabin Medical Centre, Petah Tikva, Israel. Preoperatively, women ranked their anxiety level using a verbal numeric anxiety score (VNS). In addition, we recorded the extent of ovarian stimulation and measured the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) using gastric ultrasound. There was no substantial correlation between preoperative VNS anxiety and antral CSA (p = .697). Moreover, the number of follicles, blood estradiol, and progesterone levels did not correlate with antral CSA (p = .590, p = .104, and p = .511, respectively). In conclusion, neither preoperative anxiety nor extensive ovarian stimulation affects gastric size in fasting healthy patients. However, further studies are warranted in this area to define these findings better. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04833530.

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in flexible bronchoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine (DEX), is a highly selective alpha2 adrenoceptor (α2-AR) agonist, successfully used in various procedures including flexible bronchoscopy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating DEX sedation during bronchoscopy report equivocal results regarding respiratory and hemodynamic outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an RCT to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine compared to propofol for sedation during bronchoscopy. The primary outcome was the number of desaturation events, secondary outcomes were transcutaneous Pco2 level, hemodynamic adverse events and physician and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Overall, 63 patients were included, 30 and 33 in the DEX and propofol groups, respectively. The number of desaturation events was similar between groups, median (IQR) 1 (0-1) and 1 (0-2) in the DEX and control groups, respectively (P = 0.29). Median desaturation time was 1 (0-2) and 1 (0-3) minutes in the DEX and control groups, respectively (P = 0.48). Adverse events included hypotension, 33% vs 21.1% in intervention and control groups, respectively (P = 0.04), bradycardia, cough, and delayed recovery from sedation. Total adverse events were 22 and 7 in DEX and propofol groups, respectively (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Dexmedetomidine sedation during bronchoscopy did not show differences in oxygen saturation and transcutaneous CO2 level in comparison to propofol. Moreover, DEX sedation required a significantly higher number of rescue boluses, due to inadequate sedation and was associated with a higher rate of adverse events. Trial registration NCT04211298, registration date: 26.12.2019.

Intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery: Incidence, risk factors and physician perception.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative pain is a possible complication of neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. There is little information available about its incidence, risk factors and physician perception. METHODS: Parturients undergoing spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean delivery were enrolled. Before surgery, parturients were asked about preoperative anxiety on a verbal numerical scale (VNS), anticipated analgesic requirement, postoperative pain levels, Spielberger STATE-TRAIT inventory index, Pain Catastrophizing Scale. After surgery, parturients were asked to answer questions (intraoperative VNS pain). The anaesthesiologist and obstetrician were asked to fill out a questionnaire asking about perceived intraoperative pain. Influence of preoperative anxiety on intraoperative pain (yes/no) was assessed using logistic regression. Mc Fadden's R2 was calculated. The agreement in physician perception of intraoperative pain with reported pain by the parturient was examined by calculating Cohen's kappa and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 193 parturients in our analysis. Incidence of intraoperative pain was 11.9%. Median intraoperative VNS pain of parturients with pain was 4.0 (1st quartile 4.0; 3rd quartile 9.0). Preoperative anxiety was not a good predictor of intraoperative pain (p-value of ß-coefficient = 0.43, Mc Fadden's R2  = 0.01). Including further preoperative variables did not result in a good prediction model. Cohen's kappa between reported pain by parturient and by the obstetrician was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.01, 0.41) and by the anaesthesiologist was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.12, 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial incidence (11.9%) of intraoperative pain during caesarean delivery. Preoperative anxiety did not predict intraoperative pain. Physicians did not accurately identify parturients' intraoperative pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Intraoperative pain occurred in 11.9% and severe intraoperative pain occurred in 1.11% of parturients undergoing elective caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. We did not find any preoperative variables that could reliably predict intraoperative pain. Obstetricians and anaesthesiologists underestimated the incidence of intraoperative pain in our cohort and thus, more attention must be put to parturients' pain.